TAXONOMY Back to top
Three closely related genera, Campylobacter,
Arcobacter, and Sulfurospirillum, are included
in the familyCampylobacteraceae (99,
126). The family Campylobacteraceae includes
22
species within the genusCampylobacter, 7
species in the genus Arcobacter, and 6 species in
the genus Sulfurospirillum. Since the
completion of the first genome sequence
of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni (103),
additional complete genome sequences of C.
jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis have been published (42,
54, 107) with genome
sizes varying from 1.59 to 1.85 Mb. Two reviews on
comparative genomics
of Campylobacter have been published (18,
80). Since the last edition of this Manual, several
new species and subspecies ofCampylobacter have
been proposed including C.
canadensis (61), isolated from whooping cranes at the Calgary
Zoo; C. avium from poultry
(113), C. peloridis (26)
isolated from human feces, dialysis fluid, and shellfish; two
subspecies of C. lari (26);
and C. cuniculorum from rabbits (140); as well as
two Arcobacter species, Arcobacter
mytili (23), isolated from mussels and A. thereius, from
pigs and ducks (55). Bacteroides
ureolyticus was reclassified as Campylobacter
ureolyticus (129). A detailed review on the taxonomy of Campylobacteraceae
was recently
published (25).
DESCRIPTION OF THE AGENTS Back to top
Campylobacter spp. are curved, S-shaped, or spiral rods that are 0.2 to 0.9 μm
wide and 0.5
to 5 μm long. Occasional species such as C.
hominis form straight
rods. Campylobacter species are
gram-negative, non-spore-forming rods that may form
spherical or coccoid bodies in old cultures or
cultures exposed to air for prolonged periods.
Organisms are usually motile by means of a single
polar unsheathed flagellum at one or both
ends, but some may lack flagella. Species are
generally microaerobic with a respiratory type
of metabolism; however, some strains grow
aerobically or anaerobically. An atmosphere
containing increased hydrogen is required by some
species for microaerobic growth (128).
Arcobacter spp. are gram-negative, slightly curved, curved, S-shaped, or
helical non-sporeforming
rods that are 0.2 to 0.9 μm wide and 1 to 3 μm
long. Organisms are motile with a
single polar unsheathed flagellum.Arcobacter spp.
grow microaerobically at 15, 25, and 30°C
but have variable growth at 37 and 42°C. Organisms
are microaerobic and do not require
increased hydrogen for growth. Arcobacter spp.
may grow aerobically at 30°C and
anaerobically at 35 to 37°C. Most strains are
nonhemolytic. A. skirrowii may be alphahemolytic
(130). A. halophilus is an obligate halophile
and grows poorly on media containing
less than 2% NaCl (31).
Originally classified as free-living Campylobacter
species, Sulfurospirillum spp. are slender,
curved gram-negative rods, 0.1 to 0.5 μm wide and
1 to 3 μm long. All of the species are
sulfur reducers and exhibit variable metabolic
activity. S. deleyianum is the type species of
the genus. These species have no known
pathogenicity for humans or animals, are
environmental organisms isolated from water
sediments, and are not further discussed in
this chapter chapter 126.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TRANSMISSION Back to top
Campylobacter species are primarily zoonotic, with a variety of animals
implicated as
reservoirs for human infection (Table 1). In addition to food animals such as poultry, cattle,
sheep, and pigs, Campylobacter species may
be present in domestic pets. Humans appear to
be the only recognized reservoirs for the
periodontal-disease-related species C. concisus, C.
rectus, C. curvus, and C. showae.
Campylobacter
infections are common both in the developed and developing worlds.
The
reported
incidence of culture-confirmed infections varies considerably from country to
country,
and as culturing practices and reporting requirements can vary, direct
comparison
of
the reported incidences can be complex. In the United States, where reporting
practices
vary
from state to state, the foodborne diseases active surveillance program FoodNet
(www.cdc.gov/foodnet)
provides uniform reporting from a panel of sentinel sites, giving an
accurate
incidence of diagnosed infections. Since FoodNet surveillance began in 1996,
the
incidence
of culture-confirmed Campylobacter infections in FoodNet sites has been
found to
have
declined 30% when 2006 data are compared to the 1996–1998 baseline (2).
Most of
the
decline occurred from 1996 to 1999; there was a more moderate decrease between
1999
and
2006. In 2008, the incidence of laboratory-confirmedCampylobacter infections
in
FoodNet
was 12.68 per 100,000 persons, ranging from 30.23 in California to 6.66 per
100,000
in Maryland (17); this estimated incidence of infections caused
by Campylobacter
did not change significantly compared with the incidence for the preceding
3
years (2005 to 2007). However, C. jejuni subsp.jejuni (referred
to as C. jejuni) continues
to
be the most common enteric pathogen isolated from patients reported from some
states
in
FoodNet with 1.4 million cases estimated in the United States annually (115).
Because of
underdiagnosis
and underreporting, the actual incidence in any country is substantially
greater
than the reported incidence. For example, in the United States, it was
estimated that
the
true incidence was 35-fold higher than reported incidence, or 515/100,000 in
1999
(115).
In Europe, campylobacter infection is quite common, with an incidence rate of
approximately
50/100,000 population (96).
The
epidemiology of campylobacteriosis in the United States does not appear to have
changed
over the last 20 years (96). Campylobacter infections are usually sporadic; the
incidence
starts to rise in March with a peak in the summer months and declines in early
fall
(96).
Infection usually follows ingestion of improperly handled or cooked food, primarily
poultry
products. Case-control studies both in the United States and Europe continue to
find
eating
poultry to be a significant risk factor for developing campylobacteriosis (96).
Outbreaks
usually occur in the spring and fall months, and in recent years, most
outbreaks
have
been associated with food (poultry or unpasteurized dairy products) or water.
Approximately
one-half of the outbreaks in the United States from 1998 to 2004 were
associated
with dairy products or water; the remaining outbreaks were mostly foodborne,
and
44% were attributed to poultry (96).
The number of foodborne Campylobacter outbreaks
in
the United States appears to be increasing; from 1998 to 2002 there were 64
foodborne
Campylobacter outbreaks causing 1,628 illnesses, compared to 92
outbreaks and
1,431
illnesses during 2003 to 2007.
(http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/outbreak_data.htm).
Outbreaks in other
developed
countries are also associated with food, water, or dairy contamination (96).
The
incidence
of Campylobacter infection in developing countries such as Mexico and
Thailand is
much
higher than in the United States. In developing countries, Campylobacter is
frequently
isolated
from individuals who may or may not have diarrheal disease. Most symptomatic
infections
occur in infancy and early childhood, and incidence decreases with age.
Travelers
to
developing countries are at risk for developing Campylobacter infection,
with isolation
rates
from 0 to 39% reported in different studies. The incidence of infection follows
a
bimodal
age distribution with the highest incidence in infants and young children
followed by
a
second peak in young adults 20 to 40 years old (115).
Secondary transmission
of Campylobacter
from ill persons to other individuals is rare, even though the infectious
dose
for developing illness is not particularly high (96).
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Back
to top
C.
jejuni and C.
coli
C.
jejuni and C. coli have been recognized since the early 1970s as
agents of gastrointestinal
infection.
C. jejuni is one of the most common causes of bacterial enteritis in the
United
States.
C. jejuni and C. colicontinue to be the most common Campylobacter
species
associated
with diarrheal illness and produce clinically indistinguishable infections.
Most
laboratories
do not routinely distinguish between these organisms. In patients with
gastroenteritis
caused by C. jejuni/C. coli, patients’ symptoms range from none to
severe,
including
fever, abdominal cramping, and diarrhea (with or without blood/fecal white
cells)
that
lasts several days to more than 1 week (10).
The usual incubation period is about 3
days
with a general range of 1 to 7 days. Symptomatic infections are usually
self-limited, but
relapses
may occur in 5 to 10% of untreated patients (10). Campylobacter
infection may
mimic
acute appendicitis and result in unnecessary surgery. Extraintestinal
infections have
been
reported following Campylobacter enteritis and include bacteremia,
hepatitis,
cholecystitis,
pancreatitis, abortion and neonatal sepsis, nephritis, prostatitis, urinary
tract
infection,
peritonitis, myocarditis, and focal infections including meningitis, septic
arthritis,
and
abscess formation (10). Bacteremia has been reported to occur at a rate of 1.5 per
1,000
intestinal infections with the highest rate in the elderly (118).
Persistent diarrheal
illness
and bacteremia may occur in immunocompromised hosts, such as patients with
human
immunodeficiency virus infection, and may be difficult to treat (10).
Deaths
attributable
toC. jejuni infection are uncommon (10).
The health burden of
campylobacteriosis
appears to be substantial and may be underrecognized (84).
C.
jejuni is the most often recognized infection preceding the development of
Guillain-Barre
syndrome
(GBS), an acute paralytic disease of the peripheral nervous system (89).
Certain
heat-stable
(HS) serotypes appear to be overrepresented in some GBS cases, such as HS:19
and
HS:41; however, other more common serotypes are frequently reported (89).
The
pathogenesis
of Campylobacter-induced GBS involves host immune responses to
gangliosidelike
epitopes present in the core region of the lipooligosaccharide (44),
which in
the
susceptible host mediate damage to the peripheral nerves, where ganglioside
targets are
highly
enriched (138).
Reactive
arthritis sometimes follows Campylobacter infection, with the onset of
pain and joint
swelling
averaging 2 weeks, with an average range lasting from a few weeks to nearly a
year.
Reiter’s syndrome may also occur in some patients (10).
The literature is mixed on the
role
of HLA B27 as a risk factor for reactive arthritis (10).
The
pathogenesis of Campylobacter enteric infection is still not well
understood. The infective
dose
ofCampylobacter is not well defined, but as few as 500 organisms may be
capable of
causing
illness (10). The signs and symptoms of infection suggest an invasive
mechanism of
disease.
A variety of determinants may be important in the virulence of C. jejuni infection,
including
adherence to the intestinal mucosa, bacterial effects on the cell, and
inflammatory
responses
by the host (68). Campylobacter does not produce a classic, choleralike
enterotoxin
(137).
Campylobacter
Species Other than C.
jejuni and C.
coli
Campylobacter
species other than C. jejuni and C. coli are
increasingly isolated from human
infections
by improved culture methods that are more optimal for the non-C. jejuni and
non-
C.
coli species.
C.
fetus subsp. fetus is primarily associated with bacteremia and
extraintestinal infections
during
pregnancy or in the compromised host (11). Although
gastroenteritis does occur with
this
species, the incidence is probably underestimated because the organism may not
grow
well
at 42°C and is usually susceptible to cephalothin (cefalotin), an antimicrobial
agent used
in
some common selective media for stool culture (132). C.
fetus subsp.fetus produces a
surface
protein microcapsule composed of a high-molecular-weight surface layer protein
that
is
essential for virulence (11). C. fetus subsp. venerealis causes bovine venereal
campylobacteriosis
and is a cause of bovine infertility but is rarely the cause of human
infection
(11).
C.
upsaliensis is a thermotolerant species that causes diarrhea and bacteremia in
humans
and
is also associated with canine and feline gastroenteritis (69).
Over a 10-year period, C.
upsaliensis
was the most common non-C. jejuni/coli species isolated
from stool samples
submitted
to the laboratory for culture (133). C. upsaliensis is
susceptible to many
antimicrobial
agents present in C. jejuni selective media and thus is usually not
isolated on
routine
primary isolation media; it can be recovered using the filtration technique
described
below.
C.
lari is a nalidixic acid-resistant, thermophilic species first isolated
from gulls of the
genus
Larus and from other avian species, dogs, cats, and chickens. C. lari
has been
infrequently
reported from humans with bacteremia and gastrointestinal and urinary tract
infections
(69). Recent phylogenetic studies have described two subspecies, C.
lari
subsp. concheus and C. lari subsp. lari (26).
Other
Campylobacter species have been isolated from clinical specimens of
patients with a
variety
of diseases, but their pathogenic role has not been determined (69). C.
jejuni
subsp. doylei is a nitrate-negative subspecies of C.
jejuni rarely recovered from
patients
with upper gastrointestinal tract infections and gastroenteritis (69).C.
hyointestinalis
has been occasionally associated with proctitis and diarrhea in
human
infection.
C. concisus is associated primarily with periodontal disease but has
also been
isolated
from patients with bacteremia, foot ulcer, and upper and lower gastrointestinal
tract
infections
(69). Although C. concisus has been isolated from many
patients with diarrheal
illness,
it can also be isolated from the feces of healthy individuals, and there is no
convincing
evidence to date that it causes diarrhea (35). C.
sputorum has been associated
with
lung, axillary, scrotal, and groin abscesses (70). C.
sputorum bv. paraureolyticus,
formerly
referred to as catalase-negative urease-positive campylobacter, has been
isolated
from
patients with diarrhea, but the significance of this finding is unknown (101). C.
mucosalis
was reported to have been isolated from two children with
enteritis, but
subsequent
testing showed that the isolates were actually C. concisus (100). C.
helveticus
(119) has been recovered from domestic cats and dogs and has not been
reported
from
human sources. C. rectus is primarily isolated from patients with active
periodontal
infections
but has also been isolated from a patient with pulmonary infection (69, 111)
and
breast
abscess (49). There is some suggestion that C. curvus may be an
etiologic agent in
diarrheal
illness (1), but it was rarely isolated from stool samples in another large
study
(35). C.
curvus is also isolated from patients with periodontal infections and in
patients with
a
liver abscess and pneumonia (49). C. showae has been
isolated from the human gingival
crevice
(36). C. gracilis has been isolated from patients with
appendicitis/peritonitis,
bacteremia,
soft-tissue abscesses, and pulmonary infections (85). C.
hominis has been
isolated
from fecal samples of healthy individuals and may be a commensal of the oral
cavity
(71). C.
lanienae was isolated from two asymptomatic abattoir workers, but its
clinical
significance
is unknown (73). C. canadensis (61)
has been isolated from whooping cranes at
the
Calgary Zoo and C. peloridis (26)
from human feces, dialysis fluid, and shellfish. C.
cuniculorum
was isolated from the cecum of rabbits but not reported from
humans (140). C.
avium
is a hippurate hydrolase-positive species that was isolated from
broiler chickens and
turkeys
but has not been reported from human samples (113). A
review on the clinical
significance
of non-C. jejuni/C. coli species was published previously (69).
Arcobacter
Arcobacter
spp. are aerotolerant, Campylobacter-like organisms
frequently isolated from
bovine
and porcine products of abortion and feces of animals with enteritis (39).
Two of the
seven
Arcobacter species have been associated with human infection. A.
butzleri has been
isolated
from patients with bacteremia, endocarditis, peritonitis, and diarrhea (70, 132). A.
cryaerophilus
has been previously characterized into two DNA related groups, 1A
and 1B
(65). A.
cryaerophilus group 1B has been isolated from patients with bacteremia and
diarrhea
(70, 132) and also from healthy individuals (57),
suggesting a commensal role for
this
species. Group 1A has been isolated from animal sources (65). Arcobacter
butzleri was
reported
to be the fourth most commonCampylobacter-like organism isolated from
patients
with
diarrhea by Vandenberg et al. (132) and was also one of the
most common non C.
jejuni/coli
species isolated over a 10-year period from over 73,000 stool samples
(133).
Thus,
A. butzleri may be underrecognized if appropriate culture conditions are
not used. In a
survey
of 2,855 Campylobacter-like isolates submitted for characterization from
laboratories
in
France, A. butzleri was identified in 1%, primarily from fecal samples
of patients with a
diarrheal
illness (109). A. skirrowii was reported to be isolated from a human
stool culture in
a
patient with chronic diarrhea, but the role of this species in human disease is
unknown
(139). A.
nitrofigilis, a nitrogen-fixing bacterium found on the roots of a small
marsh plant in
Nova
Scotia, is not associated with human disease (39). Arcobacter
cibarius has been
isolated
only from poultry carcasses; the medical significance of this species is
unknown
(56). Arcobacter
halophilus requires increased salt for growth in culture; however, the
medical
significance of this species is unknown (31). Arcobacter
thereius has been isolated
from
liver and kidney of spontaneous porcine abortions and from the cloacae of ducks
but
has
not been reported from human samples (55). Arcobacter
mytili was recently isolated
from
shellfish from northeastern Spain and has not been reported from human samples
(23).
COLLECTION, TRANSPORT, AND STORAGE OF
SPECIMENS Back to top
Fecal Samples
Fecal
specimens are preferred for isolating Campylobacter species from
patients with
gastrointestinal
infections; however, rectal swabs are acceptable for culture. For hospitalized
patients,
the “3-day” rule (rejection of specimens collected >72 h after admission)
should be
used
as a criterion for acceptability of routine culture requests (48, 53).
For routine
purposes,
a single stool sample has high sensitivity for common enteric pathogens, but
two
samples
may be desirable, depending upon clinical circumstances such as a >2-h delay
in
transport
of the first sample that could affect recovery (39). A
transport medium should be
used
when a delay of more than 2 h is anticipated and for transporting rectal swabs.
Several
types
of transport media are useful for Campylobacter including alkaline
peptone water with
thioglycolate
and cystine, modified Stuart medium, and Cary-Blair medium (39).
Transport
media
such as commercial Stuart medium and buffered glycerol saline do not appear to
perform
well. Modified Cary-Blair medium containing reduced agar (1.6 g/liter) appears
to be
the
most suitable single transport medium for Campylobacter as well as other
enteric
pathogens.
Specimens received in Cary-Blair medium should be stored at 4°C if processing
is
not
performed immediately. Use of Cary-Blair medium supplemented with laked sheep
blood
may
be useful for prolonged storage of stool samples and recovery of C. jejuni (136).
Blood
Campylobacter
species, primarily C. fetus, C. jejuni, and C.
upsaliensis, have been isolated
from
blood; however, in only a few studies have optimal conditions for
isolating
Campylobacter from blood culture systems been evaluated. Both the Bactec
system
(BD,
Sparks, MD) (aerobic bottles) and Septi-Chek system (BD, Sparks, MD) appear to
support
the growth of the common Campylobacter species (39).
The BacT/Alert system
(bioMerieux,
Inc.) also supports the growth of Campylobacter fetus (22).
Other systems such
as
anaerobic broth or lysis centrifugation may not be as sensitive (39).
DIRECT EXAMINATION Back
to top
Microscopy
Clinical
microbiologists do not normally consider performing Gram stain analysis of
stool
samples
for diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis; however, this is a rapid and
sensitive
method
for presumptive diagnosis ofCampylobacter enteritis. Campylobacter spp.
are not
easily
visualized with the safranin counterstain commonly used in the Gram stain
procedure
and
are somewhat thinner than other enteric gram-negative bacteria; carbol-fuchsin
or 0.1%
aqueous
basic fuchsin should be used as the counterstain for smears of stools or pure
cultures
(39). Because of their characteristic morphology, Campylobacter spp.
may be
detected
by direct Gram stain examination of stools obtained from patients with acute
enteritis,
with sensitivity ranging from 66% to 94% and specificity above 95%.
Phasecontrast
and
dark-field microscopy have also been used to directly detect motile
campylobacters
in fresh stool samples; however, the sensitivity of these approaches has not
been
studied widely, and in our opinion these methods require significant
microscopic
expertise
(39).
Fecal
white cells may be present during Campylobacter infection and have been
reported in
25%
to 80% of culture-proven cases (53).
There is no known correlation between the
number
of cells present and infection. While the likelihood of infection with Campylobacter
or
other
enteroinvasive pathogens may be higher in the qualitative presence of fecal
leukocytes,
the absence of fecal leukocytes does not rule out the diagnosis. Thus, routine
examination
of stool samples for fecal leukocytes is not recommended as a test for
predicting
bacterial
infection or for selective culturing for Campylobacter or other stool
pathogens
(39, 48).
Antigen Detection
Several
commercially available antigen detection systems for Campylobacter in
stool samples
are
now currently available; the ProSpecT Campylobacter assay (Alexon-Trend,
Inc.,
distributed
through Remel), the Premier Campy Campylobacter assay (Meridian Biosciences),
and
the ImmunoCard Stat! Campy assay (Meridian Biosciences). When compared with
culture,
the ProSpecT immunoassay has been shown to vary in sensitivity from 80 to 96%
and
has a specificity of >97% (28, 52, 124).
This enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was found to
cross-react
with C. upsaliensis (28). Antigen may be detected
in stored stool samples at 4°C
for
several days (32). The Premier Campylobacter assay is a microtiter plate-based
EIA,
while
the ImmunoCard STAT! Campy assay is a one-step lateral flow immunoassay; both
are
reported
to be specific for the detection ofCampylobacter jejuni and C. coli, but
there are
limited
available data on their performance characteristics. Other EIAs available
outside the
United
States have variable performance (123).
Given that a Campylobacter infection is a
low-incidence
disease, the specificity values described to date for the Campylobacter antigen
detection
assays mentioned above suggest that these tests can lead to poor positive
predictive
values.
Nucleic Acid Detection Techniques
Amplification
techniques have been used directly to detect Campylobacter in stool
samples
(105, 116).
Molecular approaches to detecting Campylobacter directly may improve the
time
to
detection, identification to the species level, and identification of the less
common
Campylobacter species often missed by conventional culture. A
commercially
available
molecular test for detection of Campylobacter spp. in fecal samples is
not currently
available.
This approach is also more expensive than culture and does not provide an
isolate
for
further characterization.
ISOLATION PROCEDURES Back
to top
Most
Campylobacter species require a microaerobic atmosphere containing
approximately
5%
O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2 for optimal recovery. Several manufacturers produce
microaerobic
gas generator packs that are suitable for routine use. A trigas incubator or
evacuation
and replacement of an anaerobic jar with the approximate gas mixture may also
be
used for routine cultures (39). The anoxomat (Mart Microbiology,
distributed through
Spiral
BioTech) is a convenient automated system for the evacuation and gas
replacement of
jars
used for generating different atmospheric conditions, including microaerobic
conditions
(13).
The concentration of oxygen generated in candle jars is suboptimal for the
isolation
of Campylobacter
and should not be used for routine laboratory isolation procedures (39).
Some
species of Campylobacter, such as C. sputorum, C. concisus, C.
mucosalis, C.
curvus,
C. rectus, and C. hyointestinalis, require increased hydrogen for
primary isolation
and
growth. These species will usually not be recovered under the conventional
microaerobic
conditions,
since the amount of hydrogen generated in properly used commercial gas-packs
is
<2%. A gas mixture of 10% CO2, 6% H2, and the balance N2 used in an
evacuationreplacement
jar
is sufficient for isolating hydrogen-requiring species. A study by Vandenberg
and
colleagues reemphasized the requirement of increased hydrogen for isolating
certain
Campylobacter spp. (132).
A
number of selective media have been recommended for isolating C. jejuni and
C. coli.
These
include two blood-free media, charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (CCDA)
and
charcoal-based
selective medium (CSM); and two blood-containing media, Campy-CVA
(cefoperazone,
vancomycin, amphotericin) medium and Skirrow medium (39).
Although CVA
medium
is commonly used in the United States for isolating Campylobacterfrom
clinical stool
specimens,
there are limited data available to assess the ability of CVA to
recoverCampylobacter
species from stool specimens, when compared to
other
Campylobacter-selective media; additional evaluation studies are
warranted. Charcoalbased
media
containing cefoperazone, amphotericin, and teicoplanin (CAT media) are
selective
media for the primary isolation of C. upsaliensis (7).
Two studies, however, did not
isolate
C. upsaliensis from any stool samples by use of this medium (35, 52). C.
upsaliensismay
occasionally be recovered on some other selective media. C.
upsaliensis
isolates can also be recovered by using the filtration method, and
some strains
may
grow better in a hydrogen-enriched atmosphere (46, 70).
To
achieve the highest yield of Campylobacter from stool samples, a
combination of media
that
includes either CCDA or CSM appears to be the optimal method (33)
and may increase
the
recovery of Campylobacter by as much as 10 to 15% over the use of a
single medium. If
only
a single medium is used, we suggest using Campy-CVA, CCDA, or CSM. In a
comparative
study, CCDA medium was found to be the most sensitive for detecting C.
jejuni
and C. coli compared with Skirrow’s medium, CAT agar, and
filtration technique (35).
If Campylobacter
infection is suspected at the time blood specimens are drawn, broth media
should
be subcultured after 24 to 48 h to a nonselective blood agar medium and plates
incubated
under microaerobic conditions at 37°C, preferably with increased hydrogen. This
allows
for the isolation of thermophilic and nonthermophilic species. While commonly
used
blood
culture systems should support the growth ofCampylobacter and give
appropriate
signals
if positive, it may be prudent to perform a blind subculture. Similarly, blood
drawn in
Isolator
(Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ) tubes for bacterial culture should include
a
nonselective
blood agar plate incubated under microaerobic conditions at 37°C
if Campylobacterinfection
is suspected. If a curved, gram-negative rod is observed upon
Gram
stain examination of a positive blood culture bottle, an aliquot should be
cultured on a
nonselective
blood agar plate and incubated under microaerobic conditions at 37°C. An
alternative
staining method such as acridine orange may also be useful for detecting
campylobacters
in blood culture bottles if the Gram stain is negative.
Optimal
conditions for recovery of Arcobacter from clinical specimens have not
been
determined.
Arcobacterspp. were first isolated on semisolid media designed to
isolate
Leptospira spp. (39). Arcobacter species are aerotolerant and have been
recovered on
certain
selective media such as Campy-CVA (5)
incubated under microaerobic conditions at
37°C
and on nonselective media used in the filtration method (132).
Selective media for
isolation
of Arcobacter spp. from human stool samples were evaluated by Houf and
Stephan
(57).
Both selective plates and enrichment broth containing selective supplements
with 5-
fluorouracil,
amphotericin B, cefoperazone, novobiocin, and trimethoprim showed good
recovery
of Arcobacter sp. (57). Several other media have
been reported to
recover
Arcobacter species but have not been studied in clinical settings (5, 24,130).
Enrichment Cultures
Enrichment
broths formulated to enhance the recovery of Campylobacter from stool
include
Preston
enrichment, Campy-thio, and Campylobacter enrichment broth (39).
Enrichment
cultures
may be beneficial in instances where low numbers of organisms may be expected
due
to delayed transport to the laboratory or after the acute stage of disease when
the
concentration
of organisms may be low, such as in the investigation of GBS following
acute
Campylobacter infection (87).
The clinical advantage and cost-effectiveness of using
enrichment
cultures as part of the routine stool culture setup have not been studied
adequately.
Filtration
Filtration
techniques designed to isolate C. jejuni and C. coli as well as
other
Campylobacter species (35, 39,132)
and Arcobacter spp. (65, 132, 133)
that are
susceptible
to antibiotics present in most selective media should be used to complement
direct
culture to selective plating media. As only stool samples containing ~105CFU/ml
of Campylobacter
will be detected with filtration, it should not be used as a replacement
for
direct
culture, because the filtration method is not as sensitive as primary culture
with
selective
media (46).
The
method is based on the principle that campylobacters can pass through membrane
filters
(0.45-μm
to 0.65-μm pore size) with relative ease (because organisms are thin and highly
motile)
while other elements of the stool microbiota are retained during the short
processing
time.
Cellulose acetate membrane filters with a 0.65-μm pore size are recommended for
routine
use and available from a number of suppliers (39).
Filtration is performed by placing
a
sterile 0.65-μm-pore-size cellulose acetate filter onto the surface of an agar
medium such
as
antibiotic-free CCDA, CSM, or blood-containing medium. Ten to 15 drops of fecal
suspension
are placed on the filter, and the plate is incubated at 37°C for 45 to 60 min.
The
filter
is then removed, and the plate incubated at 37°C under microaerobic conditions,
preferably
with an atmosphere containing increased hydrogen (for the hydrogen-requiring
species).
Species
within the genus Campylobacter and Arcobacter have different
optimal temperatures
for
growth. The choice of incubation temperature for routine stool cultures is
critical in
determining
the spectrum of species that will be isolated. By convention, most laboratories
use
42°C as the primary incubation temperature forCampylobacter. This
temperature allows
growth
of C. jejuni and C. coli on selective media while inhibiting
other fecal microbiota. C.
upsaliensis
also grows well at 42°C but usually is not recovered on selective
media. C.
fetus
exhibits variable growth at this temperature and may not be
recovered.
Arcobacter species will generally not be recovered at 42°C.
In
contrast, most Campylobacter and Arcobacter species grow well at
37°C. Selective media,
such
as Skirrow medium, were devised for use at 42°C and have poor selective properties
at
37°C,
whereas CCDA and CSM show good selective properties at 37°C (33).
Plates should be
incubated
a minimum of 72 h before being reported as negative. It has been reported that
incubation
of CCDA medium for 5 to 6 days increased the yield of C. jejuni and C.
coli
compared with 2 days of incubation (35).
Because
of the expense of including several types of media and the filtration method in
the
initial
workup forCampylobacter, a practical approach is to use a single medium
for isolation
of
thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in the workup of acute bacterial
gastroenteritis, such as
Campy-CVA,
CCDA, or CSM incubated at 42°C. If the primary culture workup is unrevealing
and
for patients with persistent diarrhea, cultures for non-C. jejuni/C.
coli species may be
appropriate.
Additional stool samples should be plated on multiple selective media (e.g.,
CCDA
or CVA), processed by the filtration method as well, and incubated at 37°C
under
microaerobic
conditions with increased hydrogen.
IDENTIFICATION Back to top
The
identification of Campylobacter species is made difficult because of
their complex and
rapidly
evolving taxonomy, fastidious growth requirements, and biochemical inertness (Table
2).
These problems have resulted in a proliferation of phenotypic and genotypic
methods for
identifying members of this
group (39).
Campylobacter
spp. and Arcobacter
spp.
Depending
on the growth medium used, Campylobacter colonies may have different
appearances.
In general,Campylobacter spp. produce gray, flat, irregular, and
spreading
colonies.
Spreading along the streak line is commonly seen, particularly on freshly
prepared
media.
As the moisture content decreases, colonies may form round, convex, and
glistening
colonies
with little spreading observed. Thus, proper storage of media to ensure
moisture
content
is important for optimal isolation and recognition of Campylobacter spp.
Hemolysis
on
blood agar is not observed. Arcobacter colonies are morphologically
similar to those
of Campylobacter
(126, 130).
The
Gram stain appearance of Arcobacter may differ from that of typical Campylobacter.
A.
butzleri
is only slightly curved, while A. cryaerophilus tends to be
much more helical in
appearance
than Campylobacter. Commercial systems for identification
of Campylobacter
species were not found to be more accurate than conventional tests (60).
Unfortunately,
Campylobacter species are difficult to differentiate from Arcobacterspecies
based
on phenotypic tests. However, an aerotolerant species (i.e., exhibiting growth
under
aerobic
conditions) that grows on MacConkey agar under microaerobic conditions could be
presumptively
identified asArcobacter. The failure to grow on MacConkey, however, does
not
rule
out Arcobacter species.
C.
jejuni and C.
coli
For
initial analysis, a Gram stain examination of the colony should be performed
along with
an
oxidase test. Oxidase-positive colonies exhibiting a characteristic Gram stain
appearance
(e.g.,
gram-negative, curved to S-shaped rods) isolated from selective media incubated
at
42°C
under microaerobic conditions can be reliably reported as Campylobacter spp.
The most
common
species, C. jejuni, is relatively easy to identify phenotypically;
hydrolysis of sodium
hippurate
is the major test for distinguishing C. jejuni (and also C. jejunisubsp.
doylei) from
other
Campylobacter species. Strains isolated on selective media that grow at
42°C, are
oxidase
positive, show characteristic microscopic morphology, and are positive for
hippurate
hydrolysis
should be reported as C. jejuni, and for routine clinical purposes no
other tests
need
to be performed (Fig. 1). Methods for this test are described elsewhere (74).
Occasional
strains of C. jejuni are hippurate negative, making them more difficult
to identify.
Gas-liquid
chromatography for detecting benzoic acid (liberated from hydrolysis of sodium
hippurate)
is the most sensitive assay for hippurate hydrolysis and can be used for more
definitive
determination. Molecular detection of the hipO (hippuricase) gene or
other C.
jejuni-specific
markers (Table 3) by PCR may be useful for identifying phenotypically
negative
isolates (50) and weakly positive isolates (15)
and to clarify false-positive results
for
non-C. jejuni species (27, 29). A
comparison of different PCR targets to differentiate C.
jejuni
from C. coli has been published (31, 112).
Evaluations of these C. jejuni-specific PCR
tests
have shown no one test to be entirely specific or sensitive; therefore, the use
of more
than
one target for molecular identification of C. jejuni is recommended. In
addition, false
negatives
or nonspecifically amplified product(s) have been noted for some of the C.
jejunispecific
assays;
therefore, a second PCR, targeting another C. jejuni-specific gene, may
be
necessary
in some instances. The use of heated lysates rather than purified DNA may not
always be a suitable
reaction template for these PCR assays (83,97).
With
the exception of hippuricase activity, which C. coli is lacking, C.
coli and C. jejuni are
similar
biochemically (Table 2). Therefore, molecular methods are needed to accurately
identify
C. coli and differentiate it from hippurate-negative C. jejuni; most
have proved both
accurate
and sensitive (97). If molecular testing is not available, strains isolated on
selective
media
that grow at 42°C, are oxidase positive, show characteristic microscopic
morphology,
and
are hippurate negative and indoxyl acetate positive should be reported as
hippuratenegative
C.
jejuni/C. coli (Fig. 1). Susceptibility
(inhibition) or resistance
of Campylobacter
spp. to nalidixic acid and cephalothin were historically used as an aid for
species
identification. However, with the increasing prevalence of fluoroquinolone
resistance
in
these species, the use of these disk identification assays can no longer be
relied upon.
For
species other than C. jejuni, phenotypic characterization is more
problematic. An
algorithm
for identification of the thermophilic Campylobacter spp. is shown in Fig.
1. The
most
useful tests for initial identification include growth at 25°C, 37°C, and 42°C,
catalase
production,
hippurate hydrolysis (74), indoxyl acetate hydrolysis (75),
and production of H2S
(8).
Additional
tests can be performed to aid in the identification of Campylobacter spp.(Fig.
1).
To
obtain consistent and reproducible results, a standardized suspension and
inoculum
should
be used for performing phenotypic tests. For growth temperature and oxygen
tolerance
studies, a suspension of the organism in heart infusion broth or tryptic soy
broth
with
turbidity at a McFarland standard of 1 should be used. A fiber-tipped swab
dipped in the
broth
suspension should be used to make a single streak across the plate
(Mueller-Hinton
agar
with 5% sheep blood is a suitable medium), and the plates should be incubated
at the
desired
temperature and/or atmospheric conditions (8, 86).
Several
commercial systems have been developed as an aid to
identifying
Campylobacter spp. to the genus level. Two immunologic reagents are
currently
available
in the United States for culture identification: Campy-JCL (Scimedx Corp.,
Denville,
NJ)
and Dryspot Campylobacter Test Kit (Remel). Campy-JCL was previously evaluated
and
does
not differentiate between C. jejuni and C. coli (90).
The Dryspot Campylobacter latex
test
is reported by the manufacturer to identify but not differentiate C. jejuni,
C. coli, C.
lari,
and C. upsaliensis and to yield variable results for C.
fetus subsp. fetus (Oxoid USA,
www.oxoid.com).
A DNA probe (Accuprobe; Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, CA) directed
against
Campylobacter rRNA sequences identifies Campylobacter to the
genus level and
detects
C. jejuni subsp. jejuni, C. jejuni subsp. doylei, C. coli, and
C. lari (108, 122).
However,
the probe also hybridized with 2 of 17 C. hyointestinalis strains (108).
Thus, these
methods
may be useful for confirming Campylobacter to the genus level if other
tests are not
conclusive.
However, they cannot be used to rule out Campylobacter, and the
crossreactivity
of
these tests with closely related taxa and/or more newly described species needs
to
be determined.
Because
many species of Campylobacter and Arcobacter are difficult to
identify by
phenotypic
testing alone, tests for detection of species-specific sequences via PCR have
been
developed.
The 16S rRNA gene and 23S rRNA gene are widely used for genus- and
speciesspecific
tests;
PCR assays based on these targets have been described for 12
different
Campylobacter species (98) and three Arcobacter species
(14, 58). Broad-range
molecular
identification schemes involving restriction fragment analysis of PCR-amplified
regions
of the 16S or 23S rRNA genes have also been described for identification
of Campylobacter
and Arcobacter species (16, 37,38).
Many
other gene targets have been used in species-specific PCR assays,
including
gyrA (79, 134), glyA (4),ceuE gene (45), asp
(72), lpxA (67), and a GTPase gene
(134).
Subspecies identification by PCR within C. fetus(59, 125)
and C. jejuni (81) has also
been
described. While the use of such PCR tests combines the advantages of being
quick and
easy
to perform with low cost and high-throughput capability, amenable to
automation, it is
important
to validate PCR tests to fully determine their specificity and sensitivity
before use.
More
recently, species-specific microarrays have been described for identification
of
several
Campylobacterspecies, including C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C.
upsaliensis
(64, 110, 135). While these methods are promising tools for both identification
and
further genetic characterization of Campylobacter spp., the cost and
limited availability
of
the technology in the clinical laboratory make this approach not currently
practical for
routine
application in the clinical setting.
Comparison
of 16S rRNA gene sequences is also a useful tool for differentiation
of Campylobacter
spp. from closely related taxa, such
as Arcobacter
and Helicobacter. However, it is important to note that species
level
identification
based on 16S is much more difficult, particularly for the common species
of Campylobacter.
At or above 97% identity, some groups of closely related species such
as C.
jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari; C. upsaliensisand C. helveticus; and
C. fetus, C.
hyointestinalis,
and C. lanienae cannot be confidently distinguished from
each other based on
16S
rRNA gene sequences (98). Conversely, intraspecies 16S rRNA gene diversity is seen in
other
species, such as C. hyointestinalis (51). A
commercial 16S rRNA gene microbial
identification
system, MicroSEQ (Applied Biosystems), is available to identify and classify
unidentified
bacteria, includingCampylobacter and Arcobacter species, by
comparing either
full-
or partial-length (500-bp)16S rRNA gene sequences to a validated microbial 16S
rRNA
gene
sequence library. However, partial gene sequencing using the MicroSEQ 500
system is
not
recommended for accurate identification of some of the commonly
encountered
Campylobacter species, as sequencing of the first 500 bp of the gene
only
examines
two of the four variable regions within the 16S rRNA gene
of Campylobacter
species (47); this can lead to misidentification of the groups of closely
related
Campylobacter species described above.
TYPING SYSTEMS Back to top
Typing
systems for Campylobacter epidemiologic studies vary in complexity and
ability to
discriminate
between strains. Common phenotypic methods that have been applied include
biotyping,
phage typing, and serotyping (94, 104).
The heat-labile serotyping scheme,
originally
described by Lior, can detect over 100 serotypes of C. jejuni, C. coli, and
C.
lari
(104). Uncharacterized bacterial surface antigens and, in some
serotypes, flagellar
antigens
are the serodeterminants for this serotyping system (3).
The heat-stable Penner
(HS)
serotyping scheme detects 60 types of C. jejuni and C. coli (104).
Initially thought to
detect
lipopolysaccharide antigenic determinants, the HS system has been shown to
detect
a Campylobacter
capsular polysaccharide (62). Serotyping (HS) is
performed in only a few
reference
laboratories worldwide because of the time and expense needed to maintain
quality
antisera. A serotyping reagent kit is also commercially available (Denka Seiken
USA
Inc.,
Campbell, CA).
The
limitations of phenotypic subtyping methods and the rapid growth of molecular
biology
techniques
in the 1990s led to the development of a range of molecular subtyping methods
such
as restriction endonuclease analysis, ribotyping, PCR-based techniques,
pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis
of macrorestricted chromosomal DNA (PFGE), and amplified fragment length
polymorphism
(94, 104). The development of a rapid 1-day standardized PFGE protocol
(112),
which is used by participants of the PulseNet national surveillance network for
foodborne
pathogens (www.cdc.gov/pulsenet), has facilitated the use
of this approach for
outbreak
investigations of campylobacteriosis (95).
However, interpretation of data can be
difficult
since genomic rearrangements can lead to changes in PFGE profiles (40).
Advances
in
DNA sequencing technology have provided a means to investigate strain variation
at the
nucleotide
level and have led to the emergence of DNA-sequencing-based subtyping systems
such
as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (30).
MLST is useful for studies of the population
structure
and molecular epidemiology of C. jejuni (30),
although commonly circulating
sequence
types can make recognition of outbreaks caused by these strains problematic
(19, 114).
In addition, the generation of Campylobacter whole-genome sequences has
led
the
way for the development of a new technique, genomotyping based on microarray
technology
(66). At present, no method alone is adequate for all applications,
and a
combination
of methods such as serotyping and molecular methods should be used for
reliable
determination of strain relatedness and for studying the epidemiology
of Campylobacter
infections (94). A more detailed discussion of molecular typing methods
and
their application for use in epidemiological studies of Campylobacter species
has been
recently
published elsewhere (102).
An
MLST system for Arcobacter spp. was recently reported (82).
Using a set of 374 isolates
comprising
different species, from different sources and geographic locations, no
association
of
MLST type and location or source was observed.
SEROLOGIC TESTS Back to top
Serum
immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA levels rise in response to infection, but
serum
and
fecal IgA levels appear during the first few weeks of infection and then fall
rapidly
(9, 121).
Serum antibody assays vary in both sensitivity and specificity for
detecting
Campylobacter infection, and test performance appears to be population
dependent.
Campylobacter antibody assays have been used to study patients with GBS and
reactive
arthritis (6). Patients with Campylobacter infection may give
falsepositive
Legionella
antibody test results (12).
Serologic testing appears to be useful for
epidemiologic
investigations and is not recommended for routine diagnosis (120).
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES Back
to top
C.
jejuni and C. coli have variable susceptibility to a variety of
antimicrobial agents, including
macrolides,
fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, nitrofurantoin, and
tetracycline
(www.cdc.gov/NARMS). Azithromycin and erythromycin are drugs of choice for
treating
C. jejuni gastrointestinal infections, and for susceptible organisms,
ciprofloxacin or
norfloxacin
may also be used. Early therapy of susceptibleCampylobacter infection
with
erythromycin
or ciprofloxacin is effective in eliminating the organism from stool and may
also
reduce
the duration of symptoms associated with infection (10).
C.
jejuni is generally susceptible to erythromycin, with resistance rates of
less than 10%
(10, 34, 43).
Rates of erythromycin resistance in C. coli are generally higher than in
C.
jejuni
and vary considerably, with up to 25 to 50% of strains showing resistance
in some
studies
(10, 43). Although ciprofloxacin has been effective in
treating
Campylobacter infections, emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance during
therapy has
been
reported (106). Several in vitro studies show significant rates of resistance
to
fluoroquinolones
(34, 63, 91). Resistance to fluoroquinolones has ranged from <5% in
Australia
to approximately 80% reported in Thailand (10, 41).
In 2006, approximately 20%
of Campylobacter
strains reported through the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring
System
at CDC were fluoroquinolone resistant (http://www.cdc.gov/NARMS/).
Individuals
with
fluoroquinolone-resistant C. jejuni have been shown to have a longer
duration of
diarrhea,
and thus, routine testing of isolates may be indicated (10, 93). C.
jejuni and C.
coli
are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics, generally penicillins and
narrow-spectrum
cephalosporins,
but imipenem has good anticampylobacter activity.
Parenteral
therapy is used to treat systemic C. fetus infections; drugs used
include ampicillin,
aminoglycosides,
imipenem, and chloramphenicol, depending upon the type of infection. C.
lari
is resistant to nalidixic acid but may be susceptible to
fluoroquinolones, and resistance to
macrolides
is generally low (41). C. upsaliensis is generally susceptible to a variety of
antimicrobial
agents and shows low rates of resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones
(41). Arcobacter
butzleri and A. cryaerophilus have variable resistance to macrolides and
fluoroquinolones
(41).
Agar
dilution is the method recognized by the Clinical Laboratory Standards
Institute (CLSI)
for
testingCampylobacter spp.; quality control ranges for several
antimicrobial agents have
been
published (21, 76). A broth microdilution method with published quality control
ranges
for
several antimicrobial agents and a disk diffusion method are also approved by
CLSI
(20, 77).
Studies testing Campylobacter with the Etest have been published (78).
EVALUATION, INTERPRETATION, AND REPORTING OF
RESULTS Back to top
Campylobacter
species, including the common thermophilic species C. jejuni and
C.
coli,
should be sought in all diarrheic stools submitted to the
laboratory for routine culture.
Except
for epidemiological purposes, cultures of formed stools should not be performed.
Isolation
of Campylobacter from a patient with acute diarrhea is usually
significant, since the
carrier
rate in developed countries is quite low; however, in developing countries,
isolation
might
be more difficult to interpret, especially in the presence of other enteric
pathogens. In
acute
infection, there are usually a high number of organisms in the stool, but the
quantity
of
organisms is not related to the severity of infection or indicative of a
carrier state. Gram
stain
analysis of fecal samples to look for organisms with typical Campylobacter morphology
is a
highly sensitive and specific test that is currently underutilized; it should
be performed
for
rapid preliminary diagnosis of Campylobacter infection. Other species,
such as C.
fetus
subsp. fetus and C. upsaliensis, may be important
causes of diarrhea and are not
isolated
on routine selective media. Special methods including alternative incubation
techniques
are required as described in this chapter and should be performed by special
request.
Oxidase-positive, curved, gram-negative rods that are hippurate hydrolysis
positive
should
be reported as C. jejuni without further workup. The importance of
identifying other
species
depends upon the clinical circumstance, but identification tests should always
be
performed
with isolates from blood or other sterile sites, since this could influence
antimicrobial
therapy decisions. Given that fluoroquinolone resistance is present in a
significant
proportion of C. jejuni isolates, fluoroquinolone susceptibility testing
is suggested
for
patients that are receiving or being considered for therapy of gastroenteritis.
Susceptibility
testing should be performed with all isolates from sterile clinical sites.
Use
of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the
Public
Health Service or by
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
No comments:
Post a Comment