TAXONOMY Back to top
Coxiella burnetii is a small gram-negative rod that grows within a
parasitophorous vacuole
located in the cytoplasm of a host eucaryotic cell
(invertebrate or vertebrate animal). It is a
member of the γ subgroup of theProteobacteria microbial
phylum. The closest related
bacterium is in the genus Legionella. Bergey’s
Manual of Systematic Microbiology (2005)
classifies it under the order Legionellales,
family Coxiellaceae (7). The only other member of
the genus Coxiella is the proposed “C.
cheraxi” bacterium, a pathogen of the Australian
freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus (14).
DESCRIPTION OF THE AGENT Back to top
C. burnetii consists of different morphological forms, depending on the stage
of its life cycle.
Large-cell variants (LCV; 0.4 to 1.5 μm by 0.2 to
0.5 μm) are metabolically active and divide
by binary fission inside the parasitophorous
vacuole of the host eukaryotic cell. Small-cell
variants (SCV; 0.5 μm by 0.2 μm) are electron
dense and form when conditions are no
longer conducive to active growth (13)
(Fig. 1). SCV are filterable (0.22 μm), and this
quiescent form of the cell differentially
expresses certain proteins compared to LCV
(26,64, 66, 79). SCV are functionally spores, although
chemically different from the grampositive
bacterial spore, as it lacks diaminopimelic acid.
They act as the survival and
transmissible form of the bacterium when it is
extracellular and in the environment. SCV can
survive in animal-contaminated environments (e.g.,
soil, hay, etc.) for many years, probably
decades. However, they are not as heat stable as normal
bacterial spores and can be
inactivated at 63°C for 40 minutes (56).
The cell wall, while gram-negative, stains poorly by
Gram stain and better by Gimenez stain.
The
complete genome sequences of Nine Mile and other strains of C. burnetii have
demonstrated
a circular genome with approximately 2 million base pairs, including many
insertion
sequences, and a single plasmid is found in most strains (65).
The presence of
many
pseudogenes implies a process of ongoing gene degradation presumably associated
with
an evolutionarily recent adaptation to an intracellular lifestyle. Unlike
the Rickettsiaceae,
C. burnetii does not transport ATP across its cell membrane and has
almost
full biosynthetic capabilities. It is metabolically active in the extracellular
phase,
utilizes
glucose and glutamate at low pH, and has recently been grown in cell-free
medium
(48).
Using microarray and whole-genome sequence analysis, variability in open
reading
frames
and transposon-mediated genomic plasticity have been demonstrated (4).
The
virulent form of C. burnetii is referred to as “phase I” because it is
first isolated from
humans
with Q fever, infected vertebrate animals (especially cattle, sheep, and
goats), and
ticks.
When these isolates are grown in the laboratory in tissue culture or
embryonated eggs,
the
population of bacteria gradually change to a second form (“phase II”) and
become
avirulent.
This population change can involve loss of genetic material (29),
such that the
microbe
cannot synthesize a full-length polysaccharide, lacking a terminal sugar chain
as
part
of its cell wall lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (78).
However, in some strains, loss of virulence
does
not seem to involve genomic changes (15),
presumably due to changes in the
expression
of genes coding for virulence determinants. The in vitro change from virulent
phase
I to avirulent phase II is analogous to the “smooth”-to- “rough” transition
that occurs
in
bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae group. In phase I cells, the terminal
glycan chain of the
LPS
contains three unique sugars, L-virenose, dihydrohydroxystreptose, and
galactosaminuronyl-α-(1, 6)-
glucosamine, that are not present in phase II LPS (1).
Phase I
LPS
appears to be a key virulence determinant of C. burnetii.
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TRANSMISSION Back to
top
Coxiella
burnetii is associated with vertebrate animals, especially cattle, sheep,
and goats. At
parturition,
when large concentrations of C. burnetii are present in the placenta,
fetus, and
associated
membranes and fluids, the microbe readily contaminates the animal’s
environment.
It can remain viable in soil, hay, etc., for many years (possibly decades),
presumably
in its “spore-like” form (63, 85).
Milk from infected cows and other lactating
animals
may contain C. burnetii (30),
which is destroyed by the temperature reached during
pasteurization
(39). Goats are a significant source of infection (19).
A
number of other vertebrate animals can be hosts for C. burnetii,
especially native animals,
for
example, native rats, wombats, bandicoots, and kangaroos in Australia.
Infections have
been
described for pets, including cats and dogs, with human outbreaks in North
America
linked
to parturition by these animals (8, 32,53).
Birds are also hosts (70), and various other
domestic
and wildlife species have been reported as potential host species, including
mice,
horses,
rabbits, and buffalo (43).
Numerous
tick species either harbor or transmit C. burnetii and may be important
for
maintenance
of the agent in veterinary populations, but tick transmission is not considered
a
major
route of transmission to humans. Although there are a few reports of probable
human
infection
by tick bite, the great bulk of human infections are by aerosol transmission
from an
infected
animal focus, such as a herd of parturient goats. Infection in animals appears
to be
almost
always asymptomatic, with recrudescence only during parturition usually
followed by
recovery
of the maternal animal. Australian studies showed the importance of the
bandicoot
(Isoodon
macrourus) (a marsupial) and its tick Haemaphysalis humerosa (17)
and the
kangaroo
and its tick Amblyomma triguttatum (54) in
sylvatic cycles of C. burnetii in
Australia.
Derrick
described Q fever in a large number of Australian patients, including some
probably
infected
by tick bite, although most were infected by inhalation of dust associated with
cattle
(16).
Now, Q fever is thought to be endemic in every country except New Zealand (28).
In
the
United States, 22% of veterinarians are seropositive compared to approximately
3% of
the
population overall (2, 86). Travelers and military personnel can also be infected (12, 25).
Transmission
by aerosol and wind is well recognized (73).
Nosocomial transmission,
presumably
by coughing with aerosol production, has rarely been reported (49),
as has
infection
of surgical and obstetric staff during a Caesarean section on an infected
patient
(60).
Sexual transmission has also been noted, as presumably C. burnetii was
present in
semen,
from a chronic focus in the prostate gland or testis (45).
The
epidemiology of human Q fever is a combination of the worldwide ubiquitous
distribution
of C.
burnetii; the extremely low infectious dose required for human infection
(probably
between
1 and 10 viable C. burnetii cells) (72);
the environmental conditions favoring
transmission,
such as high concentrations of infected animals, high pregnancy rates,
appropriate
environmental conditions (transmission is greater under dry conditions), and
the
strength
and direction of prevailing winds (73);
and the inherent variability in human
susceptibility
to C. burnetii. While some people are exposed and become sick, others
are
exposed
and seroconvert asymptomatically or have only mild symptoms, not sufficient to
seek
medical assistance. The proportion of persons that become ill after natural
exposure
may
be as low as 50% (18, 76).
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Back
to top
Q
fever can present in many forms: (i) as an acute undifferentiated febrile
illness, (ii) as a
chronic
infection (usually involving the cardiovascular system), or (iii) as a
postinfectious
chronic
fatigue syndrome (only recently recognized). Q fever can be latent and
recrudesce
during
periods of relative immunosuppression, such as late pregnancy, causing fetal
infection.
Infection can also result in asymptomatic seroconversion and complete clearance
of
the microbe, with the patient being unaware of infection or being only mildly
ill.
Other
features of Q fever include a higher incidence of symptomatic disease in men
than
women
and a higher incidence in middle-age men than those of other age groups.
Although
it
is claimed that occupational and exposure differences explain the gender
differences, it is
probably
not the complete picture. For example, female hormones appear to be protective
in
mice
(59).
Pathogenesis
Because
C. burnetii is an intracellular pathogen, growing in a membrane-bound
vacuole in
the
cytoplasm of a host cell, its survival in the host animal (or patient) depends
on its ability
to
survive and grow intracellularly in the host cell (82).
This in turn depends on its ability to
keep
the host cell alive, and this requires microbe-directed immunomodulation of the
host
(84).
Normally a host cell would deal with an invasion by an intracellular microbe by
activating
the host-cell self-destructing apoptotic process. Indeed, this is what happens
in
phase
II (avirulent) C. burnetii infection. The microbe is rapidly
internalized (involving
receptor
α Vβ3 integrin and complement receptor 3) (10),
and it grows until the host’s cellmediated
immune
response (involving gamma interferon and other molecules) induces
apoptosis
and the infected host cell is destroyed, along with the microbe. Certain
Toll-like
receptors
are involved in the initial microbe-host cell interaction (88).
However,
in the case of phase I (virulent) C. burnetii, a different sequence of
events occurs,
leading
to the survival and growth of the microbe (36, 81).
The type 1 LPS fails to activate
dendritic
cells (67), and the initial contact between the host cell membrane and the
bacterium
bypasses complement receptor 3 (44).
This leads to a different sequence of
intracellular
events. Genes of a type IV secretion system (similar to the Dot/Icm system
of Legionella
pneumophila) are expressed, leading to secretion of bacterial proteins into
the
cytoplasm
of the host cell (89). These proteins divert the normal intracellular autophagy
pathway,
which results in the formation of a parasitophorous vacuole. It gradually
enlarges
by
incorporating recycled endoplasmic reticulum membrane into its own vesicular
membrane,
allowing the phase I C. burnetii to grow. The inhibition of apoptosis is
mediated
by
host kinases (80), which allow the microbe to survive by preserving the infected
host cell.
The
metabolically active C. burnetii LCV continues to grow in the absence of
any effective
host
immune response despite the presence of circulating antibodies and
cell-mediated
immunity
mediated by T lymphocytes. Eventually the conditions inside the parasitophorous
vacuole
become unsuitable for ongoing logarithmic bacterial growth, presumably due to
nutrient
depletion, and C. burnetii converts to the SCV, the nonreplicating
survival form.
Even
then, the host cell may not be destroyed, leading to a state of chronicity or
latent
infection.
Host responses keep the microbe in check, but should immunosuppression
develop,
such as during pregnancy, the bacterium starts growing again, causing a Q fever
relapse.
This is well recognized during the third trimester of pregnancy. In patients
with
chronic
Q fever, there is impaired maturation of phagolysosomes, permitting ongoing
survival
of C. burnetii (23).
Acute Q Fever
Q
fever is a difficult disease to diagnose, as there are no pathognomic symptoms
or signs
that
give health care providers a clue to the etiology. Many doctors rarely consider
Q fever in
the
differential diagnosis of an acute febrile illness unless a link with animal
contact is
established
from the patient’s history. In fact, many patients without any significant
animal
contact
or tick bite develop Q fever, due to its dispersal by wind (73).
Living downwind of a
herd
of parturient animals, an animal-holding yard, or an abattoir is a risk for Q
fever.
Presenting
features include fever, headache, myalgia, elevated liver transaminases, and
interstitial
pneumonia. It is claimed that the disease may differ in its presentation in
different
countries,
especially with respect to pneumonia.
The
great diversity in acute symptoms is probably due to (i) differences in strains
of C.
burnetii;
(ii) differences in human immune response genes and how they process and
eliminate
C. burnetii (27); (iii) route of infection (patients infected by the respiratory
route
[the
most common route] are likely to develop pneumonia, and patients infected by
other
routes
[e.g. tick bite, oral, sexually transmitted, and needle stick accident] can
manifest the
illness
differently); and (iv) infecting dose, since the dose of C. burnetii (phase
I) needed to
infect
a person is between 1 and 10 bacteria. An increased dose leads to a reduced
incubation
period (72). Infecting dose is likely to influence the symptoms and clinical
course
of
the illness. Those with higher infecting doses are more likely to have severe
symptoms.
Reviews
of Q fever from Australia (16, 55, 68)
and elsewhere (41, 43,57) show the diversity
of
symptoms in this disease.
Occasionally,
acute Q fever can be fulminant (46).
However, most patients survive acute Q
fever
and defervesce in about 10 to 14 days, at which time they develop either
sterilizing or
nonsterilizing
immunity. It is the latter patients who can go on to develop chronic Q fever.
Chronic Q Fever
As a
result of the early dissemination of C. burnetii, many organ systems are
exposed and
can
become chronically infected. The cardiovascular system is particularly susceptible.
Most
cases
of chronic Q fever involve endocarditis (5),
including infection of congenitally abnormal
(e.g.,
bicuspid) or previously damaged aortic and mitral valves, aneurysms, and
vascular
grafts.
Pericarditis, myocarditis, and splenic rupture have been reported. Other
systems that
are
often involved in chronic Q fever include the gastrointestinal tract, with
chronic
granulomatous
hepatitis (Fig. 2), acalculous cholecystitis, and diarrhea; central nervous
system,
characterized by meningitis and meningoencephalitis; and bones and tendons,
with
infections.
Rare features include lymphadenopathy, migratory thrombophlebitis, rash, and
prostatitis.
Many of these pathogenic features appear to involve autoimmunity, and the
presence of autoantibodies
is a feature of chronic Q fever (9, 87).
Pregnancy and Q Fever
Q fever in pregnancy is an underrecognized problem
rarely mentioned as a cause of
congenital infection, yet it is clearly a problem
in many countries where Q fever is significant.
As pregnancy develops, latent, viable C.
burnetii starts growing in the placenta and the
fetus, leading to infection and fetal death (71).
While not recognized as one of the classical
“TORCH” agents of congenital infection, it should
be included under “O” (for “other”).
Q Fever in Children
Children appear to be less susceptible to
symptomatic Q fever than adults, as do young mice
compared to older mice (34).
Nevertheless, infections, mainly febrile or influenza like, have
been reported (37, 47,
75).
Post-Q Fever Fatigue Syndrome
While a postinfectious fatigue syndrome, lasting
weeks to months after an infectious disease
is well recognized, post-Q fever fatigue syndrome
is not yet universally acknowledged. First
described in 1996 (3, 40)
in the United Kingdom and Australia, post-Q fever fatigue
syndrome is defined as fatigue persisting more
than 12 months after the onset of acute Q
fever.
COLLECTION, TRANSPORT, AND STORAGE OF
SPECIMENS Back to top
Specimens for the diagnosis of Q fever in humans
include blood and tissue, the latter most
commonly from heart valves following valve
replacement surgery. The sample collected will
depend on the diagnostic test(s) available. Whole
blood may be used for isolation and nucleic
acid detection methods, and serum or plasma for
serologic methods. Tissue samples are
most commonly used for isolation, PCR, and
immunohistochemistry (IHC). Whole blood may
be collected in sodium citrate or EDTA tubes.
Samples to be used for isolation should be
collected aseptically and shipped promptly, while
maintaining refrigeration. If storage of
specimens prior to culture is necessary, samples
should be kept frozen before and during
shipment (at least −20°C;−80°C is preferable).
Blood or tissue samples to be tested by PCR
or IHC should be frozen (−20°C) prior to and
during shipment, although tissues fixed by the
diagnostic laboratory for IHC may be shipped at
room temperature.
For the diagnosis of a suspected acute infection
by molecular methods or isolation, whole
blood should be collected during the acute phase,
preferably prior to antibiotic therapy. For
serologic diagnosis of an acute infection, a serum
sample should be collected during the
acute phase and a second sample at 3 or 4 weeks
after onset. While the same specimens
may be used for the diagnosis of chronic infection
as for acute infection, the timing of
collection is not as critical. Blood and tissue
samples may be persistently positive by culture
and/or PCR in chronic infections, and serum
antibody levels are typically elevated (phase I
and phase II immunoglobulin G [IgG] titers of
>1,000) and sustained relative to acute
infections, which have generally lower peak titers
that decrease postinfection.
C. burnetii can be isolated from blood or tissue samples, but since it is an
obligate
intracellular bacterium, this must be done in cell
culture or embryonated chicken eggs or by
animal inoculation. Isolation must currently be
performed in specialized high-containment
biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facilities, as the agent
is highly infectious and classified as a select
agent and a CDC category B bioterrorism agent (86a).
If an isolate is propagated by a
diagnostic laboratory, U.S. federal regulations
require that it be transported to a registered
select agent laboratory or destroyed, within 7 days
(National Select Agent Registry, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention; www.selectagents.gov/cdForm.html). Diagnostic
samples can be evaluated by PCR and serologic
methods in BSL-2 facilities with the use of
appropriate personal protective equipment.
DIRECT EXAMINATION Back to top
Microscopy and Antigen Detection
IHC is an excellent method for the detection of C.
burnetii antigens in tissue samples (Fig.
3),
particularly cardiac valve tissues that are colonized during chronic Q fever.
Organisms in
heart valve tissues have also been demonstrated by
direct immunofluorescent methods or
visualized by electron microscopy (Fig. 1). However, these methods are rarely used for the
diagnosis of acute Q fever, as the appropriate
tissue samples are not often collected and will
vary among patients and because other methods (PCR
and serology) that are simpler to
perform on blood samples are available.
Nucleic Acid Detection
PCR can be a useful diagnostic tool for acute and
chronic Q fever infections (62). It is
important that the sample is collected during the
early period of an acute infection while the
patient is bacteremic (optimally within 4 weeks of
onset of symptoms). A recent study
showed that PCR can be more sensitive than
serology during the first 2 weeks after the onset
of symptoms and provide an earlier diagnosis than
with serology alone (22). Whole blood is
most commonly used for the analysis of acute
infections, although enrichment of the white
cell fraction (buffy coat) may increase
sensitivity. Serum may be used if whole blood is not
available, although it is less likely to be
positive due to the lack of infected cells. For chronic
Q fever with endocarditis, the valve tissue is
typically positive, while blood may be positive or
negative. It has been reported that PCR is
generally positive in chronically infected patients
with phase I IgG antibody titers between 1:800 and
1:6,400, but PCR is often negative in
those with higher titers. A number of PCR assays
are described that amplify the multicopy
IS1111 insertion sequence (31,
50), and these generally provide increased
sensitivity
compared to assays that amplify single-copy genes
(com1, 16S, 23S, etc.). However, the
potential for false positives with PCR makes it
imperative that these results be interpreted
relative to other diagnostic assays, such as
serology and other clinical data.
ISOLATION PROCEDURES Back to top
Isolation of C. burnetii from human blood
or tissue must be performed in a BSL-3
containment facility due to the low infectious
dose of the agent and potential for generating
aerosols. Isolation can be accomplished in tissue
culture cells or embryonated chicken eggs
or by inoculation into animals such as mice or
guinea pigs; the last requires BSL-3
containment facilities. Any infected tissue sample
can be used for isolation, and PCR assays
are quite useful for screening tissue samples
prior to isolation to determine those potentially
containing organisms. The organism can be stable
in tissue samples for months before
isolation attempts. Animal inoculation is the most
sensitive method for isolation. A mouse
can be injected intraperitoneally with up to 0.5
ml of inoculum, and the spleen harvested at
10 to 14 days postinjection. The spleen is
homogenized and injected into another mouse,
inoculated onto uninfected tissue culture cells,
or used to infect embryonated eggs for further
propagation. Isolation by animal inoculation is
particularly useful for tissue or environmental
samples that could be contaminated with organisms
other than C. burnetii, as the animal
serves to amplify Coxiella while killing
other agents. Aseptically collected tissues that likely
contain only C. burnetii can be inoculated
directly onto tissue culture cells or embryonated
chicken eggs. A shell vial method that works well
is described for isolation in human
embryonic lung fibroblast tissue culture cells (61)
and can be used with many commonly
available cell lines (e.g., Vero, RK13, THP1, and
A549) susceptible to infection byC. burnetii.
Egg inoculations work particularly well for
propagating large amounts of C. burnetii for
antigen preparation.
IDENTIFICATION Back to top
Only reference laboratories are likely to isolate C.
burnetii in pure culture and be required to
confirm its identification by classical means. In
recent years, identification is more often
accomplished by amplifying and sequencing key
genes (e.g. com1 and IS1111a). A routine
diagnostic laboratory that inadvertently isolates C.
burnetii in tissue culture could identify it
by direct fluorescent-antibody assay (Fig. 4), although specific antisera are not commercially
available.
TYPING SYSTEMS Back to top
Typing systems, based on genetic differences
between isolates, are not standardized and are
still undergoing development. While no typing
scheme is universally accepted, it is clear that
there is considerable strain/isolate variability
within the species C. burnetii.
SEROLOGIC TESTS Back to top
The detection of antibodies to C. burnetii is
the most commonly used and effective method
for the diagnosis of Q fever. The primary
serologic assays in use today are the indirect
immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) assay, the
complement fixation (CF) test, and the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with
the IFA assay being the gold standard
and most commonly used method. CF methods
generally lack sensitivity and are used less
commonly today, while ELISAs are growing in use
and availability. The diagnosis of infection
by any serologic assay may be complicated by the
facts that C. burnetii has a worldwide
distribution in nature and many humans have been
exposed and may be seropositive. All
serologic methods make use of C. burnetiiantigen
grown in either tissue culture cells or
embryonated chicken eggs. Serologic methods also
take advantage of the antigenic
differences between naturally occurring virulent
phase I C. burnetii and attenuated phase II
isolates (69). Phase I strains contain
intact LPS antigens, while phase II strains lack
complete LPS antigens. The antibodies produced
during natural human infection respond in a
unique time sequence to the phase I and phase II
forms, with the acute response directed
primarily to phase II antigens while the response
in chronic infections is a mixture of phase I
and phase II antibodies.
IFA Test
IFA tests detect IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies for
both phase I and phase II antigens and
allow for the detection of, and discrimination
between, acute and chronic infection (51). The
IFA test has excellent specificity and sensitivity
for the diagnosis of Q fever if the appropriate
samples are available. The diagnosis of acute Q
fever is dependent on seroconversion,
defined as a fourfold increase in the IgG titer
for phase II between acute and convalescent
samples. Alternately, a single serum sample with a
phase II IgG titer of ≥200 and a phase II
IgM titer of ≥50 has been used to diagnose acute Q
fever (74). Chronic infections typically
present with phase I IgG titers of >800 (43).
However, the choice of cutoff titer for acute or
chronic disease should be determined in each
laboratory, as methods for antigen
preparations, assays, and interpretation can vary.
Ideally, reference laboratories should
provide controls with known positive and negative
samples that could be used for inlaboratory
assay validation and cutoff determination.
FDA-approved, commercial C.
burnetii IFA tests are available for the diagnosis of acute Q fever (IgG
and IgM assays for
phase II antigens) and provide the best source for
laboratories not equipped to prepare their
own antigens (Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA). The
diagnosis of chronic Q fever is best
performed at reference laboratories that have
BSL-3 facilities for the propagation and
storage of phase I organisms since C. burnetii is
classified as a U.S. category B bioterrorism
agent.
ELISA
ELISAs are reported to be as sensitive and
specific as IFA tests (33, 52, 77, 83). FDAapproved,
commercial ELISAs that detect IgG or IgM
antibodies to phase II antigens are
available (Inverness, Brisbane, Australia) and are
useful for detection of IgM antibodies (20),
although not currently marketed in the United
States. A number of reference laboratories
and research institutions have also developed
in-house ELISAs. In general, ELISAs are
qualitative and have not been evaluated as
thoroughly as IFA tests. Commercial and inhouse
ELISAs can be automated to require minimal
interpretation and are particularly useful
for the detection of IgG antibodies to phase II
antigens when employed in seroprevalence
studies. However, their lack of standardization
and quantification make them less than ideal
for the diagnosis of acute Q fever, and the lack
of phase I antigens in commercial assays
limits their use for the diagnosis of chronic Q
fever.
CF Test
Whereas CF is still commonly used as a diagnostic
assay for veterinary testing, the assay is
rarely used for human diagnostics due to advances
in IFA and ELISA methods and the
demonstration that the CF test has lower
sensitivity, is more time consuming, and detects
seroconversion at a later date than the other
assays (21). False negatives with the CF assay
have also been described for chronic infections
with high titers due to a prozone effect.
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITIES, TREATMENT, AND
PREVENTION Back to top
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing is
not routinely performed. C. burnetii is an
intracellular pathogen, and correlations between
in vitro MICs of antibiotics in an infected
tissue culture system and antibiotic activity in
infected patients are uncertain.
The recommended treatment for acute Q fever is
doxycycline, although strains with partial
doxycycline resistance have been reported.
Erythromycin and azithromycin are not
recommended, as many strains are resistant (MIC of
>8 μg/ml) (35, 58). Neither
ciprofloxacin nor chloramphenicol are recommended,
as they do not inhibit in vitro growth
(6, 61). Rifampin (rifampicin) may be used, although it
is not recommended in the United
States. Treatment in pregnancy with co-trimoxazole
is recommended, as adverse outcomes
are well recognized (11).
Chronic Q fever, especially Q fever endocarditis,
requires long-term antibiotics and often
valve replacement. Doxycycline and
hydroxychloroquine are recommended for a minimum of
1 year and possibly longer. Hydroxychloroquine
increases the pH of the phagolysosome from
4.8 to 5.7 and renders doxycycline bactericidal
rather than bacteriostatic (42).
A human Q fever vaccine (QVAX) is commercially
available only in Australia (24, 38).
EVALUATION, INTERPRETATION, AND REPORTING OF
RESULTS Back to top
Serological and nucleic acid amplification (PCR)
reports for a patient evaluated for Q fever
can be difficult to understand. Interpretation
should always be provided and should include
(i) the significance of the antibody titer,
particularly the difference between antibodies to
phase I and phase II C. burnetii and the
different antibody classes detected (IgM, IgG, and
IgA); (ii) whether the serologic result supports
recent Q fever (phase II IgM high), past Q
fever (phase II IgG high), or chronic Q fever
(phase I IgG and IgA high); (iii) if there is only
one serum sample available for testing, the
importance of receiving a second serum sample
to detect a fourfold increase in antibody titer
(for example, a raised phase II IgM only in one
serum sample may represent very early acute Q
fever or a false-positive result); (iv) in
locales where vaccination occurs or where the
post-Q fever fatigue syndrome is considered, a
comment that no antibody pattern can currently
define either condition should be provided;
and (v) an indication that detection of C.
burnetii DNA in blood usually indicates acute, very
early Q fever, often before seroconversion. Tissue
specimens (e.g., heart valve, liver, and
bone marrow) are most often positive in chronic Q
fever, although peripheral blood
leukocytes from such patients can be positive or negative.
No comments:
Post a Comment